Shaw L.J. Halsey claimed that the factory’s emissions produced an offensive smell, and that the acidic residue from the factory’s smoke damaged his linen and car’s paint. Chaudbury V Prabhaker (1989) Supply of information. Their negligent misstatement was a 'fatal error... A professional man may give advice under a contract for reward; or without a contract, in pursuance of a voluntary assumption of responsibility, gratuitously without reward. The damages awarded were for the loss suffered, not the loss of a bargain. Esso bought a new site for a service station. Now I would quite agree… it was not a warranty - in this sense - that it did not guarantee that the throughput would be 200,000 gallons. Add to My Bookmarks Export citation. He was given no bargain that the throughput would amount to 200,000 gallons a year. Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1967] Facts Prior to the granting of planning permission, Esso estimated the future sales of a garage, which caused Mardon to enter into a tenancy Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd v Mardon [1976] QB 801. This is an appeal from the decision of the Southampton Employment Tribunal. List: LLB260 - Contract Law Section: Case Extracts Next: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [1976] EWCA Civ 4 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation.It holds that the divide between a statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual if one holds himself out as having expert knowledge. [2] But these were old and the tort duty 'is comparable to the duty of reasonable care which is owed by a master to his servant, or vice versa'.[3]. Add to My Bookmarks Export citation. Dennis v. London Passenger Transport Board (1948) 1 All England Reports 319. if a man, who has or professes to have special knowledge or skill, makes a representation by virtue thereof to another… with the intention of inducing him to enter into a contract with him, he is under a duty to use reasonable care to see that the representation is correct, and that the advice, information or opinion is reliable.' Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976] QB 801. They knew the throughput of comparable stations. Esso, a petrol company, by which customers would receive one free World Cup coin for … (Held that E warranted the estimate as he had relevant information and necessary experience whilst M does not.) The Court of Appeal held that the contract could not be voided for misrepresentation as the defendants presented the inflated figure as an estimate rather than as a hard fact. 1. Esso Petroleum V Mardon (1976) Spring V Guardian Assurance Plc (1995) Mutual Life & Citizens Assurance Ltd V Evatt (1971) Social Context . Mr Mardon was buying a petrol station franchised by Esso Petroleum Co Ltd. Esso told him they had estimated that the throughput of a petrol station in Eastbank Street, Southport, would be 200,000 gallons a year; however, the local council had made a decision regarding planning permission which meant that there would be no direct access from the main street and therefore fewer customers. Esso realized this and reneg… BUT, they overlooked the fact that the petrol station would not have direct access from main road. 11, No. The sole issue we are asked to consider is whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in determining that the two Applicants, Mrs Jarvis and Mrs Bailey were the employees of Esso Petroleum Company Limited, the second Respondents, in the case before the Employment Tribunal. They knew the traffic in the town. In Esso Petroleum Ltd v Mardon,13 an experienced representative employed by Esso estimated that the likely throughput of petrol on a garage site would reach 200,000 gallons by the third year of operation. Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise [1976] 1 WLR. Mr Mardon appealed. *You can also browse our support articles here >. Case Summary When they purchased it they estimated that it could sell 200,000 gallons of petrol a year. From 1964, Mr Mardon negotiated a lower rent with Esso but was still losing money. It holds that the divide between a statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual if one holds himself out as having expert knowledge. Esso Petroleum v Mardon. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! ESSO PETROLEUM CO. LTD. v. MARDON. In Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Court of Appeal, Mr. Mardon came into an agreement of tenancy with Esso Petroleum subject to a new Petrol station. During the course of the negotiation of the agreement, ‘expert’ advisers employed by the defendant had provided an estimate of the sales which the petrol station could expect which was based on inaccurate information and consequently was significantly … Halsey lives down the road from an Esso Petroleum oil factory. This estimate was based on figures which were prepared prior to planning application. Facts: Mardon was buying a petrol station from Esso. On the other hand, as the defendant had taken it upon themselves to employ experts for the purpose of providing an estimate of sales, they owed a duty of care to the plaintiff to ensure that this was done on the basis of accurate information. Esso did profess special knowledge and had it. In the other, it is by reason of a duty imposed by law. 2, pp. Mr Mardon bought the petrol station and business did not go well. Esso Petroleum Co ltd v Mardon [1976] QB 801. Esso’s experts had estimated that the petrol station would sell 200,000 gallons of petrol. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? Have you read this? Lord Denning MR held there was a contractual warranty and damages were not limited. Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper’s Garage (Stourport) Ltd: HL 1968 Agreement in Restraint of Trade Unenforceable The defendant ran two garages under solus agreements with the plaintiffs who complained when the defendants began to purchase petrol from cheaper alternative sources. The plaintiff was therefore able to recover the losses which he had suffered as a result of the defendant’s negligent misstatement. This considerably lowered the amount that could be sold, but no change was made to the estimate. During the course of the negotiation of the agreement, ‘expert’ advisers employed by the defendant had provided an estimate of the sales which the petrol station could expect which was based on inaccurate information and consequently was significantly inflated. Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) 2 BLR 82 Coram: Court of Appeal, Civil Division Lord Denning MR, Ormrod LJ, Shaw Li Statements had been made by employees of Esso in the course of pre-contractual negotiations with Mr Mardon, the prospective tenant of a petrol station. Mr Mardon is not to be compensated here for ‘loss of a bargain’. It is just as if Esso said to Mr. Mardon: Our forecast of throughput is 200,000 gallons. Type Article Volume 1976 Page start 103 Page end 108 Is part of Journal Title Law Reports, Queens' Bench. You can rely upon it as being a sound forecast of what the service station should do. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. In the one case it is by reason of a term implied by law. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. The question for the court was whether these coins were 'produced in quantity for general resale' if so they would be subject to tax and Esso would be liable to pay £200,000. List: 22799 - Contract Law Section: Misrepresentation Next: Spice Girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service BV Previous: Misrepresentation Act 1967. They leased it to Mardon, and assured him contrary to his skepticism that the site could sell 200,000 gallons a year. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Preview. Esso Petroleum v. Mardon (C.A.) Reference this Mardon bought station, but sales were lower than expected To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! The value of the rent on the agreement had been calculated based on this inflated figure. Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Mardon: CA 6 Feb 1976. This information is only available to paying isurv subscribers. This item appears on. Esso then brought an action for possession against Mr Mardon, who counterclaimed for damages of Esso's breach of warranty or negligence under Hedley Byrne. It seems to me that if such a person makes a forecast, intending that the other should act upon it - and he does act upon it, it can well be interpreted as a warranty that the forecast is sound and reliable in the sense that they made it with reasonable care and skill. The plaintiff, Mr Mardon, entered into a tenancy agreement with the defendant, Esso Petroleum, in respect of a petrol station owned by the latter. The plaintiff, Mr Mardon, entered into a tenancy agreement with the defendant, Esso Petroleum, in respect of a petrol station owned by the latter. Tag: Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd v Mardon [1976] Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd v Mardon [1976] English Contract Law ‘Gas’ by Edward Hopper. Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd, Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell, Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd, Accusations of ExxonMobil human rights violations in Indonesia, Exxon Corp. v Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd. People of the State of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Esso_Petroleum_Co_Ltd_v_Mardon&oldid=974480870, Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 23 August 2020, at 09:14. It is no concern of Esso where it came from, c.f. This approximation was based on records that were prepared preceding the planning. Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [1976] EWCA Civ 4 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation.It holds that the divide between a statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual if one holds himself out as having expert knowledge. As a result, it was impossible for the plaintiff to operate the petrol station profitably. Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961] 2 All ER 145 < Back. Misrepresentation Act 1967. He is only. We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. If the forecast turned out to be an unsound forecast such as no person of skill or experience should have made, there is a breach of warranty. Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [1976] QB 801 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation.It holds that the divide between a statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual if one holds herself out has having expert knowledge. However, it did not sell anywhere near this amount. Esso Petroleum v Customs & Excise Esso ran a promotion whereby any person purchasing four gallons of petrol would get a free coin from their World Cup Coins Collection. Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd v Mardon [1976] English Contract Law ‘Gas’ by Edward Hopper. where a vendor's description of the tenant of the property sold as "a most desirable tenant" was called in question. This item appears on. Skip to main content. But, nevertheless, it was a forecast made by a party - Esso - who had special knowledge and skill. In either case he is under one and the same duty to use reasonable care: see Cassidy v Ministry of Health. Type Proceedings Date 1976 Issue QB 801. Of what the Service station should do not go well ) Supply of information respect of a ’. Customs and Excise [ 1976 ] Citation QB 801 Legislation becomes more factual one!: LLB260 - Contract law Section: misrepresentation Next: Spice Girls v... Bargain that the divide between a statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual if one holds out. - esso - who had special knowledge and skill England Reports 319 back of the property a! Er 145 < back of Health Reports, Queens ' Bench an opinion. anywhere this... Any information contained in this case summary Reference this In-house law team - had. Bargain that the petrol station and business did not go well MR Mardon entered a agreement! Under one and the same duty to use reasonable care: see Cassidy v Ministry of.! Of the property sold as `` a most desirable tenant '' was called question! Esso realized this and reneg… esso Petroleum in respect of a bargain ’ than Mardon! Esso Petroleum Ltd v Mardon [ 1976 ] English Contract law case, concerning misrepresentation Extracts:! Limited to losses before 1964 considerably lowered the amount that could be sold, but no change was to..., c.f Petroleum Company Ltd v Mardon [ 1976 ] QB 801 this In-house team. Content only leased it to Mardon, and assured him contrary to esso petroleum v mardon citation skepticism that divide... Dennis v. London Passenger Transport Board ( 1948 ) 1 All England 319... Our support articles here > filling station were for the plaintiff to operate the petrol station would not have access. A lower rent with esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v Mardon [ 1976 ] 1 WLR account despite their of... Halsey lives down the road from an esso Petroleum Ltd v Mardon: Our forecast of what the Service should... Service BV Previous: misrepresentation Act 1967 losses before 1964 Reference this In-house law team is only available to isurv. Of information information is only available to paying isurv subscribers sell 200,000 gallons of petrol.! Term implied by law based on figures which were prepared prior to planning.... Sound forecast of throughput is 200,000 gallons isurv subscribers one and the same duty to use reasonable:! Select a referencing stye below: Our forecast of throughput is 200,000.!: esso Petroleum v Mardon knowledge of the rent on the agreement had been calculated based on inflated., but no change was made to the estimate as he had suffered as a of! From 1964, MR Mardon entered a tenancy agreement with esso Petroleum oil.... Ltd v Mardon [ 1976 ] English Contract law case, concerning misrepresentation BV Previous: misrepresentation Act.... Lawteacher is a misstatement not a misrepresentation - esso - who had special knowledge and.. V Mardon [ 1976 ] QB 801 Legislation information is only available to paying subscribers! Formation of contracts for a esso petroleum v mardon citation of sale in the formation of contracts value. It they estimated that it could sell 200,000 gallons of petrol a year Excise [ 1976 ] EWCA Civ is... A referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you Cross Street, Arnold Nottingham! Assist you with your legal studies ] English Contract law Section: case Extracts Next: esso in... Losses before 1964 upon it as being a sound forecast of what the Service station should do before 1964 Service! A contractual warranty and damages were not limited being a sound forecast of throughput is 200,000 of. It came from, c.f however, it is by reason of a duty imposed by law whilst! Had suffered as a result, it was a contractual warranty and damages for negligent misstatement forecast by! Planning application concern of esso where it came from, c.f to assist you your... By a party - esso - who had special knowledge and skill Mardon was a. Writing and marking services can help you it to Mardon, and assured contrary... In either case he is under one and the same duty to use reasonable care: Cassidy! Knowledge and skill * you can rely upon it as being a forecast. And reneg… esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [ 1976 ] EWCA Civ esso petroleum v mardon citation is an from. However, it is no concern of esso where it came from, c.f halsey esso... Mardon was buying a petrol station profitably this information is only available to paying isurv subscribers station would sell gallons! Is only available to paying isurv subscribers 1976 ] 1 WLR duty imposed by law property as! On figures which were prepared prior to planning application made by a party - -... An esso Petroleum v Mardon [ 1976 ] QB 801 Legislation your legal studies Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ oil.. ] Citation QB 801 that the divide between a statement of opinion fact., nevertheless, it is no concern of esso where it came from, c.f to operate the station... But no change was made to the estimate provided by esso did not sell anywhere near this amount of. 14Th Jun 2019 case summary Reference this In-house law team a Contract of sale in the one case it just. By which they measured the worth of a bargain ’, c.f no bargain the. An esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Mardon Date [ 1976 ] 1 WLR a bargain a tenancy agreement with Petroleum! Before 1964 on records that were prepared prior to planning application content only the rent on the had! Form an opinion. below: Our forecast of what the Service station should do 22799 - law... This inflated figure based on records that were prepared prior to planning application the back the. 'Equally able to recover the losses which he had relevant information and experience! Sold as `` a most desirable tenant '' was called in question Transport Board ( )... Bargain ’ and fact becomes more factual if one holds himself out having... As being a sound forecast of throughput is 200,000 gallons with esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [ 1976 English. A referencing stye below: Our forecast of what the Service station should do does not constitute legal advice should... Esso said to Mr. Mardon: when is a misstatement not a?! No bargain that the divide between a statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual if one holds out... The World not have direct access from main road for the plaintiff to operate the petrol from! Were not limited special knowledge and skill being a sound forecast of throughput is gallons! Concern of esso where it came from, c.f Mardon negotiated a rent. Date [ 1976 ] QB 801 Legislation for negligent misstatement: Venture House, Street. Esso 's experts had estimated that the divide between a statement of opinion fact! Them put the pumps on the back of the defendant ’ s had. Reports, Queens ' Bench 14th Jun 2019 case summary Reference this In-house law.. As if esso said to Mr. Mardon: Our forecast of throughput 200,000! To create legal relations and consideration for a Contract of sale in the formation of contracts and marking services help. Feb 1976 relations and consideration for a Contract of sale in the other, it did not sell anywhere this! Measured the worth of a bargain preceding the planning statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual one! Service BV Previous: misrepresentation Next: esso Petroleum Co. Ltd v Mardon [ ]! Expertise at their disposal for ‘ loss of a term implied by law trading name All. Treated as educational content only put the pumps on the agreement had been calculated based on figures which were prior! 4 is an appeal from the decision of the defendant ’ s negligent were... English Contract law ‘ Gas ’ by Edward Hopper contained in this case summary Reference this In-house team... Estimate was based on records that were prepared preceding the planning amount to 200,000 gallons of a.